------------------------------------------------------------------ 1st mail: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Hi there, On 9/3/05, Shaolin Tiger wrote: > Actually I wasn't really calling you a whore, I said ho, which as you should > know is a disrespectful term for women in general derived from american > hip-hop culture. We all know that "ho" is a short-form for whore, whatever you meant it to be. The fact remains that all I did was to describe, in factual, truthful details about my trip (if I were a bad tourist people will notice and not take my blog entry into account, so there remains no need to defend Msia), and you called me a ho for that. That word is only amongst some of the other very rude terms you used. Is it fair? Is it gentlemenly or even civilised? I don't think it is justified. I don't know what you were thinking when you wrote that, but I don't think I ever did anything to offend you personally, and the amount of hurt you caused me ... I just don't think I deserve it at all. > > Second don't worry, all your fanboi's showed up with flying colours, I > would say though they are mostly gibberings fools and do little to give your > country a good impression, only 2-3 actually have any logic or substance in > their comments, which is fair enough, I went too far in saying some of the > things I did, but then it's my opinion. > > Far too many anonymous cowards for my liking too, don't any of them have > the balls to validate their convictions? Rest assured my intentions were not to ask them to slam you, as I have clearly stated on my blog. I purely felt that when people like you went too far - I felt disappointed that no one defended me. "Fanbois"? I think many of my readers are actually girls. Well guys tend to like quieter girls I believe. Gibbering fools? Why, aren't yours as well? People who agree blindly are as naive as those who slam. Speaking of anonymous comments. Balls or not, is it relevant to whether their comments are valid? Surely there is no relation. At most, you can argue that people are more vicious and irresponsible when they are anonymous, but a perference for being anonymous does not equate to a definite lack of substance in their posts. Besides, people who leave comments on this topic are treading on thin ice. Look at your readers and how aggressive they are. And perhaps, well, some of mine as well. I'm sure there are people who want to say something, but do not want to receive trolls on their personal sites just because of that. Logical. If you don't like that, just disable anonymous comments like I do. =) > > You went too far a lot of people felt in your post on KL, mine was a > retort, indeed two wrongs don't make a right but well..I just felt like > defending KL :) > I don't think I went to far with my post. I validated my comments by the facts that I experienced, and I have with me five witnesses who all saw the exact same things. Well yours was not so much so of the KL defending that got people angry - it was your personal and unwarranted attacks on me, and untruthful accounts of Singapore (being incestuous for one my dear). Ask yourself whether you were being fair perhaps? > A lot of people are harping on about how you are just expressing your > opinion and it's from your experience, well I am doing the same, you > offended KL, not a person, but in doing so you offended all the people in KL > and many of those outside KL as it is the nations capital, mine is aimed at > a person in the first instance, and a country in the second. > > You made generalisations and insults aimed at malaysians, and so did I, all > is fair in the world. I didn't aim it at MALAYSIANS, I said the KL people I SAW, I EXPERIENCED, were rude. Did you not see what I wrote properly? The difference, my dear, is that I was being objective, and you subjective. I wasn't being malicious when I said my experience at KL sucked, and I don't think I hurt anyone's feelings, for I wasn't talking about them anyway. Your entry however, was obviously meant to embarrass, insult and put me down in front of everyone. If you still don't see the difference here, I really don't see a point in furthering any discussions. > > As one of the comments stated: > > "Anyway, you all can argue and argue and argue but in the end Malaysians > will still be coming into Singapore to work and Singaporeans will still be > traveling to Malaysia for holiday, for shopping etc etc..." > > Which is the fact :) > > Cheers > > ST > > -- > Share Your Knowledge > > .: http://www.shaolintiger.com :. In case you have never noticed, I still like 80% of the Malaysia I have been to. That means, in general, I LIKE MALAYSIA. I just don't like KL. As a last note, I do hope you take down my photo. The copyrights of that picture belongs to me, and is not yours to vandalise. I don't see you attacking anyone else on your blog. Why mar that image as a reasonable, civilised person just because of your disdain for me? ------------------------------------------------------------------ 2nd mail: ------------------------------------------------------------------ What did I do to you to deserve this? Please take down my pictures. I am a girl, and I have dignity too. No decent girl will like a sperm covered photo of her face being shown to the world. The least you can do, is to NOT LINK XIALANXUE. WHat are you thinking? Even if I were mean to KL, why are you doing this to me? Please take down the pictures. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 3rd mail: ------------------------------------------------------------------ What is your problem? Stepping on someone when they are already down is one of the cheapest things any human can do. Make me upset? Congratulations, you succeeded. Is my suicide what you are craving for, perhaps? I have decided to stop blogging - and sure plenty are "happy" (though, ironically, I tot they might have made themselves happy previously just without reading my site, DUH). Bringing down with your sadism are many of my readers who enjoy reading me very much - but to hell with them of course, it is only your views that are valid and important. I am very disappointed, because I usually ignore my haters as they are mere morons. I linked you up because, having read your site before, I never thought you will go as low, and as childish, as to do personal attacks. I was surprised beyond words. For all you want attack what I wrote, but don't get personal. (Speaking of which, I thought I would have made a rather good argument regarding inbreeding causing physical "weirdnesses" (ie genetic deficiencies) such as underbites, but I didn't) What made me really upset was that you linked xlx - my god, how much lower can you go? You are telling me you agree with what that muthafucker (for the lack of a worse word) writes, and you actually promote it? Did you know he also photoshopped Nicole's, Kenny gf's, head onto a porn star's body or something? *shakes head in disbelief* We haven't even counted the vicious stuff he wrote about Sandralicious and SPG. It is not funny, not to us victims anyway. Yup, the fact that I indirectly linked my own hate site made me so pissed off. I trusted you won't have done something so under-hand, but hey, its up to you what you wanted to do with the extra traffic. Stupid me. Meanwhile, here are two words I have to say to you: Grow up. I know you are far taller, but I have learnt things the hard way: I may be outspoken, but I never do personal attacks (unless the person launches it first) because first hand experience tells me that readers lose respect for the writer when they do that... Sure you get people cheering you on while you get me down. That makes you these people's idol, my dear. You are the paragon of them. You want that? These people are the filthiest breed you can get - those who feed on other's misery. Enjoy your xiaxued fame while it lasts, and I know you will, because you like the attention, and you are thick-skulled enough not to absorb nor accept any criticism made at you. Is that a good thing? I cannot decide. Besides being ridiculously childish, your arguments also lack depth and intellect. Once this issue is over, you will go back to being a mediocre blogger again. Maybe, just maybe, I will get hacked again, so it will bring some joy to your sick, boring, sadistic life. Alternatively, I think raping children might bring you some pleasure too; you seem like the sort. If it makes you feel more important, your behaviour was the last straw that made me truly disappointed in mankind. Nonetheless, thanks for taking down those photos - though I think you know that deep down, it is not as a favour for me, it is because YOU KNOW it is just NOT RIGHT. Has it ever occured to you what you will do if someone posts your daugther's face with cum on it? =) I don't think I will correspond from now on, as well, I'm supposed to be taking a break from this sick blogosphere afterall. Oh and btw: I still find I did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG. Many agree too, far more than those who *roll eyes* think I did, but logical people do not fight with the retarded. I don't even have to defend myself, because explaining things to dumb people is like teaching a cat to read a detailed and powerfully drawn map - pointless. Do not, for a moment think you have taught me a lesson. It is silly to presume so, because you are most certainly not fit to be teaching anyone morals yourself. Nor do I deem you to be wiser, cleverer, nor a better person. If I ever need to "learn" anything, it won't be from you, for I don't think I saw anything in you worthy of my learning. I took a break not because I can't handle hatemails anymore - for I get 10 times more of fan mail to soothe me anyway - but because I am truly DISGUSTED with what this blogosphere is coming to. I want to get away from it, till the sick part of me feels like fighting it again. Feel free to post this up and dissect it anyway you want, I can't be bothered anymore. Yours sincerely, Wendy ------------------------------------------------------------------ 4th mail: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Oh yeah, one more thing: You VS Me? You are not even worthy. A fight of what? My readers against my readers? Those who are on "your side" are there not because they like you, it's because they hate me. Those on mine, are there because they love me. Article Vs Article perhaps? I wrote mine - yours was a response. Is that a fight? A fight is when we both write at the same time, and not when you have your opponent's answer sheet all spread out, and then you nitpick on it... No... That should not be the way. Don't bring yourself as high as to say we are "fighting". As a blogger or a writer, I have already won, and I am not interested to fight you. You are just one of the many insignificant trying to bring me down everyday, and the only reason why I happened to mention you, is because you were the most ridiculous of all. Wendy