Comments on: Movie Review – Casino Royale – RAWKS!!

By: ShaolinTiger

ShaolinTiger — Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:14:46 +0000

Jay: Good stuff eh? Well he is Bond after all, he’s probably got GoldenBalls or something..

By: Jay

Jay — Mon, 11 Dec 2006 06:56:36 +0000

OMG I just saw it – let’s just say Daniel Craig makes me want to be Eva Green.

That body, those eyes… even after getting his bollocks whacked (repeatedly!) he can still shag the bird (albeit after a suitable period of recuperation and medical attention, of course…)

By: The Great Swifty Speaketh!

The Great Swifty Speaketh! — Thu, 07 Dec 2006 12:44:15 +0000

Swifty Reviews ‘Casino Royale’…

All right, I said in my previous entry I’m going to write something heavy, but I’m still not ready for that, so I’ll just churn out another film review for a film I saw last night (first movie I saw……

By: ShaolinTiger

ShaolinTiger — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:27:40 +0000

spiller: Bond of course, he has M & Q Bourne just has some hot chicks and serious mental problems

KY: I was using it (RAWKS) in a fully ironicalist way..

KFC: I didn’t find any of it draggy really, it was needed character development for the new bond…I thought it was great all the way through!

froggy: I’m a reseller for my own hosting, interested

Slinky: I guess because he’s not slick nor smooth, is blond and not typically good looking. But really, he nailed the part and he’s the most qualified actor to have played Bond so far.

Jon Bailey: The whole Sony plugging did catch my eye, was a bit OTT but still didn’t ruin the movie for me.

Irene: Perhaps he was really blonde in the beginning, then went grey from stress so dyed it brown/black?

steelrage: Sean Connery/Roger Moore are much better for me.

By: steelrage

steelrage — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:27:53 +0000

brosnan was a good bond? amongst all the bond movies , i didn’t like the ones with brosnan the most…

By: Irene

Irene — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 18:22:42 +0000

bodicea: yeah, this bond isn’t as promiscuous as the previous… did find that a tad disappointing – not enough eye candy to ogle at haha.

By: bodicea

bodicea — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:47:47 +0000

i suppose it’s time i watch the movie.

9/10 reviews said it’s good (pun not intended)

1/10 was a true Brosnan fan. he wanted more promiscuity.

By: Irene

Irene — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:49:34 +0000

daniel criag was good, but i’m still wondering why didn’t he dye his hair in order to stick to the orginal dark-haired bond stereotype. what gives?

By: beefstew

beefstew — Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:57:28 +0000

I think he should not be as good as the others because the others potraying the “seasoned bond” while Daniel Craig potraying a “fresh-out-of-farm bond”.

As for Judi Dench… It is illogical if you look older in episode 1 compare to the episodes after that.

By: sming

sming — Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:42:09 +0000

I enjoyed Casino Royale very much !! I think Daniel Craig made Bond looks human …. real… rough.. and manly…And I also tot he wouldn’t portray Bond as good as others.. And yes, I was so wrong !! I couldn’t stop thinking about his eyes and body after the show…