<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 350D (Rebel XT) vs Nikon D70s vs Olympus E500</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/</link>
	<description>Inane Ramblings of a Photographer/Hacker/Brit in Malaysia Eating, Drinking and Partying!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:20:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaleha</title>
		<link>http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-78643</link>
		<dc:creator>zaleha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 04:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-78643</guid>
		<description>do you know where can i buy manfrotto tripod model 520MVB &amp; 501 pro video head

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do you know where can i buy manfrotto tripod model 520MVB &amp; 501 pro video head</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-40700</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-40700</guid>
		<description>Personally, I took the 350D. It&#039;s compact and light, has less noise at high ISO, and in my opinion has a better selection of lenses. I know that the 18-55 isn&#039;t the best in the world, but I just bought a 17-40 F4/L which is definitely great. 

As far as being to small goes, I disagree. I have big hands, and I&#039;m a tall guy overall, but the 350D isn&#039;t hard to use once you know the layout and I think it feels pretty high quality. For the money, I think it&#039;s better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I took the 350D. It&#8217;s compact and light, has less noise at high ISO, and in my opinion has a better selection of lenses. I know that the 18-55 isn&#8217;t the best in the world, but I just bought a 17-40 F4/L which is definitely great. </p>
<p>As far as being to small goes, I disagree. I have big hands, and I&#8217;m a tall guy overall, but the 350D isn&#8217;t hard to use once you know the layout and I think it feels pretty high quality. For the money, I think it&#8217;s better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clickNsnap</title>
		<link>http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-17658</link>
		<dc:creator>clickNsnap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-17658</guid>
		<description>Currently, I&#039;m using A70 &amp; looking forward for my very 1st DSLR... between 70s or 350D, really don&#039;t know which one to chose...

May I know both of the cameras have the backlight on status LCD?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently, I&#8217;m using A70 &amp; looking forward for my very 1st DSLR&#8230; between 70s or 350D, really don&#8217;t know which one to chose&#8230;</p>
<p>May I know both of the cameras have the backlight on status LCD?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: easyriderloves csandbf2</title>
		<link>http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-15497</link>
		<dc:creator>easyriderloves csandbf2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 17:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-15497</guid>
		<description>Hi &lt;b&gt;shaolintiger&lt;/b&gt;,

Nice article, I really enjoyed reading it. Yeah it&#039;s a tough choice between the two because each has its pros and cons, there is no perfect camera. I suggest try them at the shops and follow your heart. 

I&#039;m just starting out in photography with a Canon Powershot A430. I would love to get a DSLR, but honestly I can&#039;t afford it yet.

Look me up in Velocity Forums. My username is latterbuoy.

Cheers,
latterbuoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi <b>shaolintiger</b>,</p>
<p>Nice article, I really enjoyed reading it. Yeah it&#8217;s a tough choice between the two because each has its pros and cons, there is no perfect camera. I suggest try them at the shops and follow your heart. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just starting out in photography with a Canon Powershot A430. I would love to get a DSLR, but honestly I can&#8217;t afford it yet.</p>
<p>Look me up in Velocity Forums. My username is latterbuoy.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
latterbuoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osx</title>
		<link>http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-15447</link>
		<dc:creator>osx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 05:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-15447</guid>
		<description>I was a Nikon user, but I dropped that in a heartbeat and happily shooting with Canon RebelxT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a Nikon user, but I dropped that in a heartbeat and happily shooting with Canon RebelxT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elb</title>
		<link>http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-15155</link>
		<dc:creator>elb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 00:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-15155</guid>
		<description>Why not a 20D? I&#039;m sure there are a few lying around somewhere for decent prices after the release of the 30D. Given that the 30D is really nothing more than a cosmetic makeover of the 20D, you will hardly lose anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not a 20D? I&#8217;m sure there are a few lying around somewhere for decent prices after the release of the 30D. Given that the 30D is really nothing more than a cosmetic makeover of the 20D, you will hardly lose anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DieHardX</title>
		<link>http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-14881</link>
		<dc:creator>DieHardX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 13:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-14881</guid>
		<description>u can&#039;t compare e two as u know they r released at a far different time. e canon is like mid feb 2005, e nikon d70s is like late april 2005 and e olympus late sep 05. generally, e trend is e later e release, e better it will b.

b4 dslr, during e slr time, nikon was alwiz world no.1 2nd place is alwiz a fight between canon, minolta, olympus. but canon holds most of e 2nd placing than e rest. of coz u have some bad ass brands like sigma, leica n mamiya which r damn rare n freaking expensive.

in e dslr arena, it is a totally different ball game. canon honestly is far more superior n cheaper than nikon in terms digital technology. nikon honestly is abit behind in tis department.

looking thru e range of dslrs of both, mpixel 2 mpixel, canon is better 4 nite taking, cheaper n has faster n higher megapixel power cameras!

still, nikon is still a good choice 4 all e past reputations it has. so i guess u must get ur priorities rite. if niteshot is ur biggest difficulty with normal digicams like most of us r having with lotsa noise, i think u go 4 e one with least noise with highest ISO it can go. dat is something i alwiz dun have e privilege 2 have.

olympus? forget itlah, nikon or canon or go single!

remember, e investment on a dslr brand is 4 life. once u commit, u have 2 grow old with her! haha! unless u r rich n afford 2 different wives! haha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>u can&#8217;t compare e two as u know they r released at a far different time. e canon is like mid feb 2005, e nikon d70s is like late april 2005 and e olympus late sep 05. generally, e trend is e later e release, e better it will b.</p>
<p>b4 dslr, during e slr time, nikon was alwiz world no.1 2nd place is alwiz a fight between canon, minolta, olympus. but canon holds most of e 2nd placing than e rest. of coz u have some bad ass brands like sigma, leica n mamiya which r damn rare n freaking expensive.</p>
<p>in e dslr arena, it is a totally different ball game. canon honestly is far more superior n cheaper than nikon in terms digital technology. nikon honestly is abit behind in tis department.</p>
<p>looking thru e range of dslrs of both, mpixel 2 mpixel, canon is better 4 nite taking, cheaper n has faster n higher megapixel power cameras!</p>
<p>still, nikon is still a good choice 4 all e past reputations it has. so i guess u must get ur priorities rite. if niteshot is ur biggest difficulty with normal digicams like most of us r having with lotsa noise, i think u go 4 e one with least noise with highest ISO it can go. dat is something i alwiz dun have e privilege 2 have.</p>
<p>olympus? forget itlah, nikon or canon or go single!</p>
<p>remember, e investment on a dslr brand is 4 life. once u commit, u have 2 grow old with her! haha! unless u r rich n afford 2 different wives! haha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackwidow</title>
		<link>http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-14711</link>
		<dc:creator>blackwidow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 01:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-14711</guid>
		<description>Get Nikon D70s. For amatuer, this is a good camera. Canon Rebel is like a toy after you touch and feel D70s. My sister, bro and myself are D70s users, we love it so much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get Nikon D70s. For amatuer, this is a good camera. Canon Rebel is like a toy after you touch and feel D70s. My sister, bro and myself are D70s users, we love it so much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asyraf Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-14699</link>
		<dc:creator>Asyraf Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 00:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-14699</guid>
		<description>Wow, I am so not worthy after looking at all the comments, dude XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I am so not worthy after looking at all the comments, dude XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Chong</title>
		<link>http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-14650</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Chong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 16:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaolintiger.com/2006/05/24/canon-350d-rebel-xt-vs-nikon-d70s-vs-olympus-e500/#comment-14650</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Kelvin:&lt;/b&gt; Ah, yes... the SB800 does have more power - but when you&#039;ve come to the point where an SB600 isn&#039;t illuminating your ceiling enough (and hence, your subjects), I don&#039;t think an SB800 would matter much more. It&#039;s not THAT much more powerful.

I find that in normal indoor conditions with ceilings around 10ft high, the SB600 is perfect (although you have to stick a white card to it to illuminate your subjects&#039; faces).

If you&#039;re shooting in a situation where the ceiling is too high (i.e. in a ballroom), I&#039;d normally switch to a higher ISO (about 800 or 1600) and use a direct flash in slow sync (shutter speed approx 1/60s) AND (this is the important bit) &lt;i&gt;use a colour gel on the SB600&lt;/i&gt; - to equalise the colour temperature from the flash and the tungsten lightbulbs used in these sort of environments. I normally get much better results this way than I ever would with a bounce flash.

To each his own, but this is my prefered set up (just my two cents).

Also, the D70s &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; control multiple SB600s wirelessly - like the D200, it has a built-in wireless commander mode (though not as sophisticated). And don&#039;t fret over the inability to control the strength of each SB600 - if it&#039;s too powerful, simply push it further away :)

&lt;b&gt;ShaolinTiger:&lt;/b&gt; Don&#039;t underestimate the usefulness of a tripod :)

The best time to take arty farty shots is usually around or after sunset - that&#039;s when the contrast between the sky and your subjects is at its least, allowing you to capture brilliant, subtle nuances that are normally lost when shooting in bright daylight.

In these situations, you may find your camera shooting at 1/20s - even at ISO1600 and maximum aperture. That&#039;s too slow for a handheld shot.

But on the other end of the extreme, don&#039;t pack a tripod as a permanent fixture with your camera gear. Sometimes, it can be a hell of a nuisance to carry.. -_-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Kelvin:</b> Ah, yes&#8230; the SB800 does have more power &#8211; but when you&#8217;ve come to the point where an SB600 isn&#8217;t illuminating your ceiling enough (and hence, your subjects), I don&#8217;t think an SB800 would matter much more. It&#8217;s not THAT much more powerful.</p>
<p>I find that in normal indoor conditions with ceilings around 10ft high, the SB600 is perfect (although you have to stick a white card to it to illuminate your subjects&#8217; faces).</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re shooting in a situation where the ceiling is too high (i.e. in a ballroom), I&#8217;d normally switch to a higher ISO (about 800 or 1600) and use a direct flash in slow sync (shutter speed approx 1/60s) AND (this is the important bit) <i>use a colour gel on the SB600</i> &#8211; to equalise the colour temperature from the flash and the tungsten lightbulbs used in these sort of environments. I normally get much better results this way than I ever would with a bounce flash.</p>
<p>To each his own, but this is my prefered set up (just my two cents).</p>
<p>Also, the D70s <i>can</i> control multiple SB600s wirelessly &#8211; like the D200, it has a built-in wireless commander mode (though not as sophisticated). And don&#8217;t fret over the inability to control the strength of each SB600 &#8211; if it&#8217;s too powerful, simply push it further away <img src='http://www.shaolintiger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><b>ShaolinTiger:</b> Don&#8217;t underestimate the usefulness of a tripod <img src='http://www.shaolintiger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The best time to take arty farty shots is usually around or after sunset &#8211; that&#8217;s when the contrast between the sky and your subjects is at its least, allowing you to capture brilliant, subtle nuances that are normally lost when shooting in bright daylight.</p>
<p>In these situations, you may find your camera shooting at 1/20s &#8211; even at ISO1600 and maximum aperture. That&#8217;s too slow for a handheld shot.</p>
<p>But on the other end of the extreme, don&#8217;t pack a tripod as a permanent fixture with your camera gear. Sometimes, it can be a hell of a nuisance to carry.. -_-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

